Climate change could force more than a billion people to flee their homes, says major health report

The movement of people is set to cause an international health crisis, the research from The Lancet suggests

Click to follow
The Independent Online

More than a billion people could be forced to flee their homes because of global warming, according to new research.

The movement of people, as well as the various effects of climate change, could be about to trigger a major health crisis, according to a new study from The Lancet.

Global warming is already leading some to conclude the climate-change migrants are being forced to move because of extreme changes in the amount of rain and temperature changes destroying their ability to farm. It notes that some have blamed the Syrian conflict on migration into the cities that was caused by a drought that seems to have been induced by climate change.

It notes that “migration driven by climate change has potentially severe impacts on mental and physical health, both directly and through the disruption of essential health and social services”.

That is the conclusion of the sweeping new research, which brings together a range of different studies looking at the health impacts of climate change. It suggests that the possible impact of those changes on people’s health could be vast – and that governments must act quickly to clean up the air and address environmental problems before they begin to kill people.

The study concludes that people can adapt to some of the less dramatic changes. But there are powerful limits to the amount people can adapt, it says – and so governments need to work hard both to mitigate the effects of climate change and help people adapt to them, in an attempt to deal with that health crisis.

It says that if those recommendations are taken up, it could avoid the disasters that it sees in the future. “The indicators reveal some stark warnings for human health as well as some glimmers of hope,” said Dr Clare Goodess, a senior researcher at the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia.

The impact of air pollution in UK cities forms part of a major investigation looking at the health and social costs of climate change around the world led by a top medical journal.

The Lancet Countdown on Health and Climate Change brought together 24 institutions and inter-governmental organisations including the WHO and World Meteorological Organisation.

It found that global exposure to dangerous levels of air pollution caused by burning fossil fuels had increased by 11.2 per cent since 1990 with more than 70 per cent of cities exceeding WHO PM2.5 limits.

Many British cities and towns also broke the WHO limits for PM10s, slightly larger sooty specks considered less of a hazard than ultra-fine particles but still harmful to health.

The authors acknowledged that European Union air quality guidelines were far less stringent than those of the WHO, with an upper safety limit for PM2.5s of 25 micrograms per cubic metre.

However, they said the WHO limits represented a “safer threshold”.

The report added that 802 London schools and a high proportion of the capital’s hospitals and clinics were located in highly polluted areas “potentially putting some of society’s most vulnerable people at risk”.

Diesel-powered vehicles, which generate pollution particles, were one of the “key drivers” of poor air quality in towns and cities in the UK, said Dr Hillman.

“Unfortunately previous policies about encouraging diesel adoption have led to an increase in the amount of diesel related pollution,” he said.

In a “briefing for UK policymakers” the report called for the expansion of Clean Air Zones nationwide and wider introduction of measures similar to London’s new T-charge, which imposes a levy on drivers of the most polluting vehicles.

The report pointed out that between 2000 and 2016 there had been a 46 per cent increase in the number of weather-related disasters around the world. During the same period of time 125 million vulnerable adults over the age of 65 had been exposed to heatwaves.

In addition, climate change had increased the threat from mosquito-borne infectious diseases.

Transmission of dengue fever by the Aedes agypti mosquito had increased by 9.4 per cent since 1950.

Professor Hugh Montgomery, co-chair of The Lancet Countdown and director of the Institute for Human Health and Performance at University College London, said: “We are only just beginning to feel the impacts of climate change.

“Any small amount of resilience we may take for granted today will be stretched to breaking point sooner than we may imagine.”

Additional reporting by agencies

Comments

    61 Comments
    slindsayyule
    210 days ago
    They won't ban cigarettes that pollutes a smokers lungs(6000g) with 11.2% of dangerous compounds with every puff of a cigarette. But want to ban the internal combustion engine by 2040. 25 micrograms per cubic metre, dangerous level nonsense. That level apparently will shorten a humans life(wait for it, by 3 days). A vehicle MOT will pass on 300 micrograms per cubic metre exhaust emissions. And CO2 carbon 13, the environmental isotope at 0.0004% will drive up global temperatures. That old chestnut. It's complete utter nonsense. Billions of people will only leave their home and migrate if there is a war, or it was planned due to work or whatever reason. But not because of the weather. Unless its a typhoon/hurricane in prone hit area. The whole story is propaganda and nothing else.     
    HelenR
    210 days ago
    Think I would give more weight to the research published in the Lancet that to your feeble analysis...
    Dennis Horne
    209 days ago
    If science denial keeps you off anti-depressants who am I to judge. We are all deeply flawed.
    wildworld
    210 days ago
    More failed predictions-

    https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/10/30/some-failed-climate-predictions/
    wildworld
    210 days ago
    The fake polar bear picture is a corker.
    wildworld
    210 days ago
    interesting how it all works-

    https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/10/30/how-google-and-msm-use-fact-checkers-to-flood-us-with-fake-claims/
    HelenR
    210 days ago
    Wattsupwiththat - disregard.  Denier propaganda
    wildworld
    210 days ago
    You need to read the Time front cover article - bunch of shysters. 


    Don't you just love the fake polar bear picture. 
    wildworld
    210 days ago
    So funny Time magazine tried to pretend they never printed this -

    http://content.time.com/time/magazine/0,9263,7601770131,00.html
    wildworld
    210 days ago

    "Quotes from Snopes:

    A rhetorical technique commonly employed by anthropogenic climate change deniers to diminish climate science is to reference fears some scientists had over the prospect of global cooling in the 1970s.

    One commonly shared pairing, floating around the internet since at least 2013, purports to show two covers of Time Magazine: A 1977 issue … As noted by Time itself in 2013, the 2006 image on the right is an authentic cover, but the 1977 image is a doctored version of an 9 April 2007 issue which actually featured an article titled “The Global Warming Survival Guide”

    HelenR
    210 days ago
    Wonkyworld:  focusing on the politics of climate change denial is pointless - just address the scientific evidence.  It's irrefutable
    wildworld
    209 days ago
    Poor old alarmists. 

    The last bleats you will hear from these poor lost souls as the world laughs at them will be

    "bleat its irrefutable bleat denier" 


    HelenR
    209 days ago
    You sound like Mystic Meg, but with less intelligence...

    I've listen to all the denier arguments trying to refute the evidence of AGW (and none of them succeeds) but yours have to be the silliest.  

    If you want to refute the science, you need to do it scientifically, but there's a catch - you need to be a bit clever.  And know stuff. You're not - and don't.


    HelenR
    210 days ago
    Cherry picking again.  A favourite trick, used by Wonkyworld is to point out failed predictions of models etc. and ignore the progress made.  

    No-one's pretending it's easy, but the science has been remarkable successful.  

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2017/03/15/the-first-climate-model-turns-50-and-predicted-global-warming-almost-perfectly/#6924ddc76614



















    wildworld
    210 days ago
    back in the early 20th century they said the earth was warming- 

    They only had to look at the glaciers melting -

    models predict what is fed into them- guess what was fed in.
    HelenR
    210 days ago
    Just had a review of all the points you made...

    All irrelevant...
    wildworld
    210 days ago
    of course you do,  you are an alarmist.
    HelenR
    210 days ago
    That doesn't address the evidence - reject...
    [removed]
    208 days ago
    This comment has been deleted
    wildworld
    208 days ago
    Lol - deblobsmog -  the science illiterate website whose funder when to prison for fraud.

    Next you will be quoting ken Lay. 
    wildworld
    210 days ago
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2014/12/05/maps-the-countries-that-have-been-hardest-hit-by-extreme-weather/

    No1 Honduras-

    "Honduras is currently growing at a rate of 2% per year'

    Climate change sure is having an effect.


    [removed]
    208 days ago
    This comment has been deleted
    wildworld
    208 days ago
    So population growth is not being effected.

    No problems then. 

    Next.








    Greg
    210 days ago
    Here's a chance for a few entrepreneurs to make a few bob.
    My money's going into inflatables, fencing and prisons.
    In the meantime, stop reading dumb comments and watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-fM0MLhl_o
    wildworld
    210 days ago
    This old chestnut again-

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/feared-migration-hasn-t-happened-un-embarrassed-by-forecast-on-climate-refugees-a-757713.html
    HelenR
    210 days ago
    WW: This article is irrelevant.

    wildworld
    210 days ago
    as is the above artvicle- more alarmist nonsense to keep the alarmists happy. 


    The world's population is increasing. Serious climate change would reduce it as happened in the past when civilizations were wiped out with a change in climate. 

    Bumper harvests year on year world wide.
    HelenR
    210 days ago
    WW: the spiegel article is an attempt to use the "Boy cried Wolf" argument to suggest the article lacks credibility.  It's a false (and silly) argument.
    HelenR
    210 days ago
    The world's population is increasing. Serious climate change would reduce it - Is also a daft argument.  There is a considerable time lag between temperature and some of the effects of climate change.  This is the daft argument you try to make about crop yields.  

    It's ridiculous.
    wildworld
    210 days ago
    "could' lacks credibility, just a word to incite the alarmists to think the world is doomed. 

    and once again you fall for it like the previous alarmist nonsense-

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/feared-migration-hasn-t-happened-un-embarrassed-by-forecast-on-climate-refugees-a-757713.html

    wildworld
    210 days ago
    You let me know when the world  population starts decreasing from lack of food. 

    The world's population is estimated to reach 11 billion by 2100 .
    HelenR
    210 days ago
    Wonkyworld:

    "The world's population is estimated to reach 11 billion by 2100"  

    You object to the word "could" but you accept the word "estimate".  

    Cherry picking.  

    You are the most naiive of deniers. Poor understanding of the concept of risk, prediction and scientific analysis

    NEXT


    wildworld
    210 days ago
    "You object to the word "could" but you accept the word "estimate".  


    So which one is it to be?

    World population is growing at 1 million per week. 
    wildworld
    210 days ago
    World Population to Hit 11.2 Billion by 2100 | Al Jazeera America
    World population projected to hit 11.2 billion ... in 15 years and 11.2 billion by the end of ... for more than half the world's population growth ...
    america.aljazeera.com/articles/2015/7/29/world-population


    no estimates here!
    HelenR
    210 days ago
    whatareyouonaboutworld:  "no estimates here!"

    of course they are estimates....
    wildworld
    210 days ago
    Not hard is it. World population increasing a million a week. 

    Year on year bumper harvests.
    HelenR
    209 days ago
    Not hard is it - it's irrelevant...
    wildworld
    209 days ago
    yep same old, same old, 

    bumper crops, world's population rising and alarmists bleating we are all doomed. 


    HelenR
    209 days ago
    The current population growth and crop yields are no measure of the likely severity of climate change in the coming decades.

    Next
    HelenR
    209 days ago
    "Warmer leads to better"

    Easily dismissed...

    "Increasing global temperatures over the last three decades have resulted in significantly reduced yields in many crops" 

    http://plantsinaction.science.uq.edu.au/content/147-high-temperature-stress

    Have you worked out why yields overall are still increasing?  (Hint - It's nothing to do with warming temperatures)

    Anyway,  think I've done enough to expose your woolly thinking for one evening.  


    wildworld
    209 days ago
    Yes Petal-

    "Bumper Russia crops lift world grain stocks hopes to record ...
    Bumper Russia crops lift world grain stocks hopes to record high - UN: World grain stocks will hit a record high in 2017-18 after all, the United Nations said ...
    agrimoney.com/news/bumper-russia-crops-lift-world-grain"
    wildworld
    209 days ago
    Yawn, year on year they are getting better. Warmer leads to better. 

    You have been badly mislead. 
    wildworld
    208 days ago
    yes petal -

    Bumper Russia crops lift world grain stocks hopes to record ...
    Bumper Russia crops lift world grain stocks hopes to record high - UN: World grain stocks will hit a record high in 2017-18 after all, the United Nations said ...
    agrimoney.com/news/bumper-russia-crops-lift-world-grain"


    burnsie
    208 days ago
    It's 'misled'.
    Just saying. (thought: someone can't spell but professes to be scientifically literate. Hmmm.)
    kumusands
    210 days ago

    As climate change leads to dramatic changes in the day today weather patterns, with hurricanes and floods frequently headlining the news around the world, it makes you wonder why people are still turning a blind eye to this ginormous issue. Is it so difficult for people to take an active role in the preservation of our mother earth?

    https://goo.gl/6DrXiG

    MightyDrunken
    210 days ago
    This is why climate change will be a problem for everyone.

    Millions of people trying to find a new home will destabilise many countries and lead to tension and probably war. We won't have to contend with only a rapidly changing climate but massive political upheaval.
    Rainy days head.
    210 days ago
    Natural selection nature will win.
    CatLiker
    210 days ago
    Nature will win.
    [removed]
    210 days ago
    This comment has been deleted
    Rocky Rex
    210 days ago

    Of course the climate has changed for various reasons in the past, but attribution studies have eliminated the 'natural' factors from responsibility for the current change.

    One attribution study is

    "A probabilistic quantification of the anthropogenic component of twentieth century global warming" - Wigley & Santer, 2012.

    Their results showed that the expected warming due to all human influences since 1950 (including aerosol effects) is very similar to the observed warming.

    HelenR
    210 days ago
    "Only people with a political or psychological need to believe fall for this stuff any more"

    Daft comment - just address the evidence...
    CatLiker
    210 days ago
    That should read: only people with a financial or psychological reason deny this stuff anymore.
    odd bod
    210 days ago
    What do you think people are falling for? What 'stuff' are you thinking about?
    If these questions are too hard for you then never mind just go back to watching Kids TV.
    toomany.com
    210 days ago
    Its not climate change...nothings actually happened yet, all of the problems above are caused by population increases, people are increasingly living in the path of natural disasters that have happened for billions of years.
    Show more comments